History
of Shit
by Dominique Laporte
MIT Press
Reviewed by
Bill
Cummings
Few books
give you sentences like "An analysis of power should take
seriously both the sight of a sovereign holding court on his pierced
chair, and the splendor of the throne as a theater of resplendent
love that splatters its subjects as they bow and kneel in pursuit
of a royal turd." Before reading Dominique Laportes
History of Shit (translated from French by Nadia Benabid
and Rodolphe el-Khoury) I would have thought the fewer such sentences,
the better. But now Im not so sure.
That there
is more to shit than its smell is the premise behind (sorry about
that, butt puns force their way into just about every sentence
I write) this slim hardback, clad in black velvety material and
published by respectable MIT Press. Laporte combines low
humor and high culture, academic theory and literary flourishes,
deliberately offending, provoking, amusing, and above all, urging
his readers to reconsider their own relationship to shit.
History
of Shit skips around through historical and literary material
from (mostly) the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries. Laporte
constantly changes strategy, coming at his topic from multiple
perspectives to demonstrate how intimately shit is connected to
who we are today. Two primary connections surface over
and over again.
First, the
development of the private, modern individual subject (thats
you and me) was linked to the elimination (oops) of public filth.
A 1539 French royal edict commanded that subjects confine
their shitting to bathrooms in their own homes, which today hardly
seems too much to ask. This is Laportes point: we
overlook how everyday behavior like shitting is as much political
as it is biological. Consider the opening of this 1694
letter from Madame la duchesse dOrléans to the Electress
of Hanover:
You
are indeed fortunate to shit whenever you may please and to
do so to your hearts content!
We are not so lucky
here. I have to hold on to my turd until evening: the houses
next to the forest are not equipped with facilities. I have
the misfortune of inhabiting one and consequently the displeasure
of having to shit outside, which gravely perturbs me because
I like to shit at my ease with my ass fully bared.
If you cant
imagine writing this, or getting a letter like it from, say, Martha
Stewart, then you too have repressed the significance of shit
and denied how this repression makes you who you are.
Second, the
success of the capitalist system itself is inexorably tied to
shit. This is metaphorical: greed and relentless accumulation
bereft of ethical concern is shitty. But it is also literal:
shit can be turned into gold by using it as fertilizer. An
astonishing number of nineteenth-century social theorists were
convinced that composting human waste would raise crop yields
and thereby eradicate hunger and poverty. More subtly,
the logic of turning shit into a valuable commodity is the purest
expression of capitalism, in which everything is reduced to its
utilitarian value and we pretend all problems can be solved by
cost-benefit analysis.
History
of Shit is a thoughtful response to something most people
like to pretend they dont do, cant smell, and which
they would prefer unmentioned. But whatever is repressed,
Laporte tells us, always returns, no matter what kind of perfume
we use to conceal its existence. It seems fitting to give
him the last word on this: "By proposing itself as the counteragent
of shit, perfume only ensures its persistence; denial only makes
the proof more positive shit is there."










Poop illustration from SmellyPoop.com
Photomodified
by Oates